Company code: Lanzhou Lishang Guochao Industrial Group Co.Ltd(600738) company abbreviation: Lanzhou Lishang Guochao Industrial Group Co.Ltd(600738)
Lanzhou Lishang Guochao Industrial Group Co.Ltd(600738)
Internal control evaluation report in 2021
Lanzhou Lishang Guochao Industrial Group Co.Ltd(600738) all shareholders:
In accordance with the provisions of the basic norms of enterprise internal control and its supporting guidelines and other internal control regulatory requirements (hereinafter referred to as the enterprise internal control normative system), combined with the company’s (hereinafter referred to as the company’s) internal control system and evaluation methods, and on the basis of daily and special supervision of internal control, we evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s internal control on December 31, 2021 (the benchmark date of internal control evaluation report). I Important statement
It is the responsibility of the board of directors of the company to establish, improve and effectively implement internal control, evaluate its effectiveness and truthfully disclose the internal control evaluation report in accordance with the provisions of the enterprise’s internal control standard system. The board of supervisors shall supervise the establishment and implementation of internal control by the board of directors. The management is responsible for organizing and leading the daily operation of the enterprise’s internal control. The board of directors, the board of supervisors and the directors, supervisors and senior managers of the company guarantee that there are no false records, misleading statements or major omissions in the contents of this report, and bear individual and joint legal liabilities for the authenticity, accuracy and completeness of the contents of the report.
The objective of the company’s internal control is to reasonably ensure the legal compliance of operation and management, asset safety, authenticity and integrity of financial reports and relevant information, improve operation efficiency and effect, and promote the realization of development strategy. Due to the inherent limitations of internal control, it can only provide reasonable assurance for the realization of the above objectives. In addition, as changes in circumstances may lead to inappropriate internal control or reduced compliance with control policies and procedures, there is a certain risk to speculate the effectiveness of internal control in the future according to the internal control evaluation results. II Internal control evaluation conclusion 1 On the benchmark date of the internal control evaluation report, does the company have any major defects in the internal control of financial reporting
□ yes √ no
2. Evaluation conclusion of internal control over financial reporting
√ valid □ invalid
According to the identification of major defects in the company’s internal control over financial reporting, there are no major defects in the internal control over financial reporting on the benchmark date of the internal control evaluation report. The board of Directors believes that the company has maintained effective internal control over financial reporting in all major aspects in accordance with the requirements of the enterprise’s internal control standard system and relevant regulations. 3. Whether major defects in internal control over non-financial reporting are found
□ yes √ no
According to the identification of major defects in the company’s internal control over non-financial reports, the company found no major defects in the company’s internal control over non-financial reports on the benchmark date of the internal control evaluation report. 4. Factors affecting the evaluation conclusion of internal control effectiveness from the benchmark date of internal control evaluation report to the date of issuance of internal control evaluation report □ applicable √ not applicable
There are no factors affecting the evaluation conclusion of the effectiveness of internal control from the base date of the internal control evaluation report to the date of issuance of the internal control evaluation report. 5. Whether the internal control audit opinion is consistent with the company’s evaluation conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
√ yes □ No 6 Whether the disclosure of major defects in internal control of non-financial reports in the internal control audit report is consistent with the disclosure of the company’s internal control evaluation report √ yes □ no III Internal control evaluation (I) Scope of internal control evaluation
According to the risk oriented principle, the company determines the main units, businesses and matters included in the evaluation scope and high-risk areas. 1. The main units included in the evaluation scope include: Lanzhou Lishang Guochao Industrial Group Co.Ltd(600738) , Lanzhou Lishang Guochao Industrial Group Co.Ltd(600738) Asia Europe catering branch, Lanzhou Asia Europe Commercial Building Co., Ltd., Lanzhou Asia Europe Commercial Building Co., Ltd. catering branch, Lanzhou Honglou Real Estate Development Co., Ltd., Lanzhou Honglou Real Estate Development Co., Ltd., Asia Europe culture and tourism development branch, Nanjing Huanbei Market Management Service Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Huanbei Silk Garment City Co., Ltd Hangzhou Huanbei Silk Garment City Co., Ltd. Shanghai Branch, Lanzhou minbai Real Estate Co., Ltd. Lanzhou Lishang Guochao Industrial Group Co.Ltd(600738) (Zhejiang) Holding Co., Ltd., Lanzhou minbai Asia Europe Property Management Co., Ltd., Lishui Guochao Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Lishang Youyi Network Technology Co., Ltd., HK beautiful Holding Group Trading Limited, Hangzhou Lishang Meilian Network Technology Co., Ltd, Mei Lanfang Lishang (Hainan) Trading Co., Ltd. 2. Proportion of units included in the scope of evaluation:
Proportion of indicators (%)
The ratio of the total assets of the units included in the evaluation scope to the total assets of the company’s consolidated financial statements 100
The total operating income of the units included in the evaluation scope accounts for 100% of the total operating income in the company’s consolidated financial statements
3. The main operations and matters included in the scope of evaluation include:
Corporate Governance: organizational structure, development strategy, human resources, social responsibility and corporate culture; Business process level: capital activities, procurement business, asset management, sales business, engineering projects, financial reports, budget management, contract management, information system, internal supervision, etc. 4. High risk areas of focus mainly include:
Capital activities, procurement business, asset management, engineering projects, contract management, cost management, management of subsidiaries, etc. 5. The above units, businesses and matters included in the evaluation scope and high-risk areas cover the main aspects of the company’s operation and management. Is there any major omission □ yes √ No 6 Is there a statutory exemption
□ yes √ no
7. Other explanatory matters
None (II) Basis of internal control evaluation and identification standard of internal control defects
The company organizes and carries out internal control evaluation according to the enterprise internal control standard system, various rules and regulations of the company and various internal control implementation rules. 1. Whether the specific identification standard of internal control defects is adjusted with that of previous years
□ yes √ no
The board of directors of the company distinguished the internal control of financial report from the internal control of non-financial report according to the identification requirements for major defects, important defects and general defects of the enterprise internal control standard system, combined with the factors such as the company’s size, industry characteristics, risk preference and risk tolerance, and studied and determined the specific identification standards of internal control defects applicable to the company, which are consistent with the previous years. 2. Internal control standards
The quantitative criteria for the evaluation of internal control defects in financial reporting determined by the company are as follows:
Index name major defect quantitative standard important defect quantitative standard general defect quantitative standard
Potential misstatement of total profits ≥ 10% of total profits 5% ≤ potential misstatement potential misstatement 5% of total profits 10% of total profits
Potential misstatement of total assets ≥ 1% of total assets 0.5% ≤ potential misstatement potential misstatement 0.5% of total assets 1% of total assets
Potential misstatement of total operating income ≥ 0.5% of total operating income ≤ potential misstatement 1% of total operating income misstatement 1% of total operating income 0.5%
Note: the relationship between the above reference indicators is or. As long as the potential misstatement of one indicator reaches the identification standard of major defect, the defect shall be identified as major defect.
The qualitative criteria for the evaluation of internal control defects in financial reporting determined by the company are as follows:
Qualitative standard of defect nature
Major defects 1. Fraud of directors, supervisors and senior managers of the company;
2. Material misstatement in the current financial report found by the certified public accountant but not identified by the company’s internal control; 3. The supervision of the management and audit department on the company’s external financial report and internal control of financial report is invalid.
Important defects important defects: individual defects or together with other defects lead to the failure to prevent, detect and correct the misstatement in the financial report that should be paid attention to by the board of directors and management although it does not meet or exceed the material misstatement standard. In case of any of the following circumstances, it shall be deemed as an important defect:
1. Failure to select and apply accounting policies in accordance with GAAP;
2. Failure to establish anti fraud procedures and control measures;
3. No corresponding control mechanism has been established or implemented for the accounting treatment of unconventional or special transactions, and there is no corresponding compensatory control;
4. There are one or more defects in the control of the financial reporting process at the end of the period, and it can not reasonably ensure that the prepared financial statements achieve the true and complete goal.
General defects and other internal control defects that do not constitute major defects or important defects.
Note: the qualitative standard of internal control defects in the company’s financial report is mainly considered from the potential impact on the financial report. 3. Identification standard of internal control defects in non-financial reporting
The quantitative criteria for the evaluation of internal control defects in non-financial reporting determined by the company are as follows:
Index name major defect quantitative standard important defect quantitative standard general defect quantitative standard
Direct property loss amount ≥ 10 million yuan, 5 million yuan ≤ loss amount 1000, loss amount 5 million yuan
Ten thousand yuan
Note: the relationship between the above reference indicators is or. As long as the potential misstatement of one indicator reaches the identification standard of major defect, the defect shall be identified as major defect.
The qualitative criteria for the evaluation of internal control defects in non-financial reporting determined by the company are as follows:
Qualitative standard of defect nature
Major defects 1. Major mistakes caused by decision-making procedures;
2. Lack of institutional control or systematic failure of important business, and lack of effective compensatory control;
3. Serious loss of middle and senior managers and senior technicians;
4. The results of internal control evaluation, especially major defects, have not been rectified;
5. Other situations that have a significant negative impact on the company.
Important defects 1. General mistakes caused by decision-making procedures;
2. Defects in important business systems or systems;
3. Serious loss of business personnel in key positions;
4. The results of internal control evaluation, especially the important defects, have not been rectified;
5. Other situations that have a great negative impact on the company.
General defects 1. The efficiency of decision-making procedure is not high;
2. Defects in general business system or system;
3. Serious loss of business personnel in general posts;
4. General defects have not been rectified.
Note: the quantitative standard of internal control defects in non-financial reporting of the company is mainly based on the amount of direct economic losses that may be caused by control defects. （3） Identification and rectification of internal control defects 1 Identification and rectification of internal control defects in financial reporting 1.1 Major defects
Whether the company has major defects in internal control over financial reporting during the reporting period □ yes √ no 1.2 Important defects
Whether the company has any significant defects in internal control over financial reporting during the reporting period □ yes √ no
1.3. General defect
None 1.4 The company’s internal control report has not been rectified on the benchmark date of √ 1.5 √ yes After the above rectification, on the benchmark date of the internal control evaluation report, whether the company has any important defects in the internal control of financial reporting that have not been rectified □ yes √ No 2 Identification and rectification of internal control defects in non-financial reporting 2.1 Major defects
Whether the company found any major defects in internal control over non-financial reporting during the reporting period □ yes √ no 2.2 Important defects
Whether the company found any significant defects in internal control over non-financial reporting during the reporting period □ yes √ no 2.3 General defect
None 2.4 After the above rectification, on the benchmark date of the internal control evaluation report, does the company find any major defects in the non-financial reporting internal control that have not been rectified □ yes √ no 2.5 After the above rectification, on the benchmark date of the internal control evaluation report, whether the company finds any important defects in non-financial reporting internal control that have not been rectified □ yes √ no IV Description of other major matters related to internal control 1 Rectification of internal control defects in the previous year □ applicable √ not applicable 2 Operation of internal control in this year and improvement direction in the next year
√ applicable □ not applicable
During the reporting period, the company organized and carried out internal control evaluation around the five elements of internal control according to the enterprise internal control standard system and other internal control supervision requirements, combined with the relevant internal control management system of the company. At the same time, the company also hired Tianjian certified public accountants（
