Company code: Jenkem Technology Co.Ltd(688356) company abbreviation: Jenkem Technology Co.Ltd(688356)
Jenkem Technology Co.Ltd(688356)
Internal control evaluation report in 2021
Jenkem Technology Co.Ltd(688356) all shareholders:
In accordance with the provisions of the basic norms of enterprise internal control and its supporting guidelines and other internal control regulatory requirements (hereinafter referred to as the enterprise internal control normative system), combined with the company’s (hereinafter referred to as the company’s) internal control system and evaluation methods, and on the basis of daily and special supervision of internal control, we evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s internal control on December 31, 2021 (the benchmark date of internal control evaluation report). I Important statement
It is the responsibility of the board of directors of the company to establish, improve and effectively implement internal control, evaluate its effectiveness and truthfully disclose the internal control evaluation report in accordance with the provisions of the enterprise’s internal control standard system. The board of supervisors shall supervise the establishment and implementation of internal control by the board of directors. The management is responsible for organizing and leading the daily operation of the enterprise’s internal control. The board of directors, the board of supervisors and the directors, supervisors and senior managers of the company guarantee that there are no false records, misleading statements or major omissions in the contents of this report, and bear individual and joint legal liabilities for the authenticity, accuracy and completeness of the contents of the report.
The objective of the company’s internal control is to reasonably ensure the legal compliance of operation and management, asset safety, authenticity and integrity of financial reports and relevant information, improve operation efficiency and effect, and promote the realization of development strategy. Due to the inherent limitations of internal control, it can only provide reasonable assurance for the realization of the above objectives. In addition, as changes in circumstances may lead to inappropriate internal control or reduced compliance with control policies and procedures, there is a certain risk to speculate the effectiveness of internal control in the future according to the internal control evaluation results. II Internal control evaluation conclusion 1 On the benchmark date of the internal control evaluation report, does the company have any major defects in the internal control of financial reporting
□ yes √ no
2. Evaluation conclusion of internal control over financial reporting
√ valid □ invalid
According to the identification of major defects in the company’s internal control over financial reporting, there are no major defects in the internal control over financial reporting on the benchmark date of the internal control evaluation report. The board of Directors believes that the company has maintained effective internal control over financial reporting in all major aspects in accordance with the requirements of the enterprise’s internal control standard system and relevant regulations. 3. Whether major defects in internal control over non-financial reporting are found
□ yes √ no
According to the identification of major defects in the company’s internal control over non-financial reports, the company found no major defects in the company’s internal control over non-financial reports on the benchmark date of the internal control evaluation report. 4. Factors affecting the evaluation conclusion of internal control effectiveness from the benchmark date of internal control evaluation report to the date of issuance of internal control evaluation report □ applicable √ not applicable
There are no factors affecting the evaluation conclusion of the effectiveness of internal control from the base date of the internal control evaluation report to the date of issuance of the internal control evaluation report. 5. Whether the internal control audit opinion is consistent with the company’s evaluation conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
√ yes □ No 6 Whether the disclosure of major defects in internal control of non-financial reports in the internal control audit report is consistent with the disclosure of the company’s internal control evaluation report √ yes □ no III Internal control evaluation (I) Scope of internal control evaluation
According to the risk oriented principle, the company determines the main units, businesses and matters included in the evaluation scope and high-risk areas. 1. The main units included in the evaluation scope include Jenkem Technology Co.Ltd(688356) , Tianjin Jenkem Technology Co.Ltd(688356) Co., Ltd., Liaoning Jenkem Technology Co.Ltd(688356) Co., Ltd. and jenkem Technology USA inc.2 Proportion of units included in the scope of evaluation:
Proportion of indicators (%)
The ratio of the total assets of the units included in the evaluation scope to the total assets of the company’s consolidated financial statements is 100.00
The total operating income of the units included in the evaluation scope accounts for 100.00% of the total operating income in the company’s consolidated financial statements
3. The main operations and matters included in the scope of evaluation include:
According to the principle of importance, the internal control evaluation of the company focuses on the five elements of internal environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication and internal supervision to supervise and evaluate the design and implementation effectiveness of the internal control of the company’s main business. The main matters include: the company’s organizational structure, human resources, budget management, research and development, contract management, engineering projects, procurement management, warehouse management, sales business, production management, cost accounting, fund management, asset management, tax management, financing management, guarantee management, investment management, financial report, internal information transmission, information system, etc. 4. High risk areas of focus mainly include:
Sales and collection process, purchase and payment process, production and storage process, R & D management process, fund management process, human resource management process, fixed assets management, financial report and other business processes. 5. The above units, businesses and matters included in the evaluation scope and high-risk areas cover the main aspects of the company’s operation and management. Is there any major omission
□ yes √ no
6. Is there a statutory exemption
□ yes √ No 7 Other explanatory matters
None. （2） Basis of internal control evaluation and identification standard of internal control defects
The company organizes and carries out internal control evaluation according to the enterprise internal control standard system and internal control evaluation system. 1. Whether the specific identification standard of internal control defects is adjusted with that of previous years
The board of directors of the company distinguished the internal control of financial report from the internal control of non-financial report according to the identification requirements for major defects, important defects and general defects of the enterprise internal control standard system, combined with the factors such as the company’s size, industry characteristics, risk preference and risk tolerance, and studied and determined the specific identification standards of internal control defects applicable to the company, which are consistent with the previous years. 2. Identification criteria for defects in internal control over financial reporting
The quantitative criteria for the evaluation of internal control defects in financial reporting determined by the company are as follows:
Index name major defect quantitative standard important defect quantitative standard general defect quantitative standard
Total profit misstatement ≥ 5% of total profit, 3% of total profit ≤ misstatement profit misstatement 3% of total profit
5% of total profit
Misstatement of total assets ≥ 1% of total assets ≤ 0.5% of total assets misstatement of assets 0.5% of total assets 1% of total assets
Misstatement of total operating income ≥ 1% of total operating income ≤ 0.5% of total operating income misstatement 1% of total operating income 0.5% of total operating income
Owner’s equity misstatement ≥ 0.5% of total owner’s equity ≤ misstatement misstatement 1% of total owner’s equity 1% of total owner’s equity
Note: the financial index values referred to in the quantitative standard are the audited consolidated statement data of the company in the previous year.
The qualitative criteria for the evaluation of internal control defects in financial reporting determined by the company are as follows:
Qualitative standard of defect nature
1. The defect involves fraud of directors, supervisors and senior managers;
2. Correction of published financial statements;
Major defects 3. The certified public accountant found that there was a major misstatement in the current financial statements, but the internal control failed to find the misstatement in the process of operation;
4. The supervision of the company’s audit committee and internal audit institutions on internal control is invalid.
1. The certified public accountant found that there were general misstatements in the current financial report, but the internal control failed to find important defects in the operation process;
2. The company’s audit committee and internal audit institutions have important defects in the supervision of internal control.
1. The certified public accountant found that there was a small amount of misstatement in the current financial report, and the internal control failed to find general defects in the operation process, so the misstatement was found;
2. There are general defects in the supervision of internal control by the company’s audit committee and internal audit institutions.
Description: none. 3. Identification standard of internal control defects in non-financial reporting
The quantitative criteria for the evaluation of internal control defects in non-financial reporting determined by the company are as follows:
Index name major defect quantitative standard important defect quantitative standard general defect quantitative standard
Amount of direct loss of total profit of property 3% of total profit of property 5% of total direct loss of profit
Note: the financial index values referred to in the quantitative standard are the audited consolidated statement data of the company in the previous year.
The qualitative criteria for the evaluation of internal control defects in non-financial reporting determined by the company are as follows:
Qualitative standard of defect nature
Major defects 1. The company’s business activities seriously violate national laws and regulations;
2. The frequent exposure of negative media news has caused significant damage to the company’s reputation;
3. Serious loss of middle and senior managers and senior technicians;
4. Lack of institutional control or systematic failure of important business;
5. The results of internal control evaluation, especially major defects or important defects, have not been rectified.
1. The company is slightly punished for violating national laws and regulations;
Major defects 2. Serious loss of business personnel in key positions; Negative news in the media, affecting local areas;
3. Defects in important business system or control system;
4. Important defects in internal control have not been rectified.
1. Violation of the company’s internal rules and regulations, but no loss;
General defects 2. Serious loss of business personnel in general posts; Negative news appears in the media, but the impact is small;
3. Defects in general business system or system;
4. General defects in internal control have not been rectified.
Description: none. （3） Identification and rectification of internal control defects 1 Identification and rectification of internal control defects in financial reporting 1.1 Major defects
Whether the company has major defects in internal control over financial reporting during the reporting period □ yes √ no 1.2 Important defects
Whether the company has significant defects in internal control over financial reporting during the reporting period □ yes √ no 1.3 General defect
None. 1.4. After the above rectification, on the benchmark date of the internal control evaluation report, does the company have any major defects in the internal control of financial reporting that have not been rectified □ yes √ no 1.5 After the above rectification, on the benchmark date of the internal control evaluation report, whether the company has any important defects in the internal control of financial reporting that have not been rectified □ yes √ No 2 Identification and rectification of internal control defects in non-financial reporting 2.1 Major defects
Whether the company found any major defects in internal control over non-financial reporting during the reporting period □ yes √ no 2.2 Important defects
Whether the company found any significant defects in internal control over non-financial reporting during the reporting period □ yes √ no
2.3. General defect
None. 2.4. After the above rectification, on the benchmark date of the internal control evaluation report, does the company find any major defects in the non-financial reporting internal control that have not been rectified □ yes √ no 2.5 After the above rectification, on the benchmark date of the internal control evaluation report, whether the company finds any important defects in non-financial reporting internal control that have not been rectified □ yes √ no IV Description of other major matters related to internal control 1 Rectification of internal control defects in the previous year
□ applicable √ not applicable
2. Operation of internal control in this year and improvement direction in the next year
√ applicable □ not applicable
The effective implementation of the company’s internal control in 2021 can provide reasonable guarantee for the preparation of true and fair financial statements and meet the objectives of internal control. In 2022, the company will continue to improve the internal control system and maintain the continuous and effective operation of the internal control system, further promote fine control, strengthen the supervision and inspection of the implementation of internal control, continuously optimize various business processes and internal control environment, and effectively prevent various risks. 3. Description of other major events
□ applicable √ not applicable
Chairman (authorized by the board of directors): Zhao Xuan, Beijing jiankaike
