Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) again, the Shenzhen stock exchange sent a letter asking to explain when the key customers moved

On the evening of April 15, Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) ( Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) . SZ) issued an announcement on the reply to the letter of concern of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. In this regard, behind the surge in revenue in the fourth quarter of 2021 proposed in the previous report of the daily economic news, the directors of the subsidiary are the contact person of the customer’s shareholders and the business cooperation of Chengdu Meixiang Culture Communication Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Chengdu Meixiang”) The key customer lemon infinite network technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “lemon infinite”) replied to three major mysteries, including the lack of trace.

But reporters found that Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) ‘s reply was still quite different from the previous investigation by reporters.

On April 17, the Shenzhen Stock Exchange again sent a letter of concern to Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) the company. The attention letter pointed out that Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) did not fully reply to the questions raised in the two letters, and the company’s annual audit accounting firm did not fully reply to the special verification opinions involved in the two letters, requiring it to further explain the relevant situation.

customer’s company has no office because they go to the countryside

In the attention letter on April 8, Shenzhen Stock Exchange Requested Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) to verify whether Zhang Lizhen, the director of the subsidiary yiyoule network technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “yiyoule”) and Shanghai Zhuoli he culture media Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Shanghai Zhuoli he”) are the shareholder contacts of the company’s customer Changsha Qingying Network Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Changsha Qingying”).

Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) replied that the legal shareholder of Changsha Qingying Beijing Tianhao culture media Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Beijing Tianhao”) is Zhang Lizhen family company. On January 21, 2022, Beijing Tianhao signed an investment agreement with Changsha Qingying, but Zhang Lizhen did not inform the listed company of the investment, and the listed company did not know the occurrence of the transaction from other channels. The investment behavior belongs to the personal behavior of Zhang Lizhen’s relatives.

In addition, the signing date of the agreement between yiyoule and Changsha Qingying is October 20, 2021. At the time of the transaction, there was no related relationship between the two parties and no related party transaction occurred. Zhang Lizhen was appointed as the director of Yi Youle on January 26, 2022. From now on, Yi Youle has a relationship with Changsha Qingying. However, since 2022, Yi Youle and Changsha Qingying have no new contract, that is, there is no related party transaction between them.

However, it is worth mentioning that Beijing Tianhao signed an investment agreement with Changsha Qingying on January 21, 2022. Zhang Lizhen was hired as a director of Yi Youle on January 26, 2022, with a time difference of less than a week.

Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) also replied that in May 2021, Zhang Lizhen officially joined the listed company and served as a director of the subsidiary Shanghai Zhuo Lihe. Due to the business adjustment of the company, he resigned as a director in June 2021.

Qixinbao shows that Shanghai Zhuo Lihe was established on June 22, 2021, Zhang Lizhen is a director, and there is no relevant industrial and commercial change information.

On the evening of April 18, the reporter interviewed the staff of Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) securities department, who said that Zhang Lizhen resigned as a director of Shanghai Zhuo Lihe on June 25, 2021. From Zhang Lizhen’s entry into a listed company to the change of work in Shanghai Zhuo Lihe and Yi Youle are all based on the overall planning of the company’s business. The staff stressed that the listed company did not know about Zhang Lizhen’s personal investment behavior. When signing the cooperation agreement with the customer Changsha Qingying, it has focused on investigating whether there is a relationship between the director, the supervisor and the senior manager, and carried out cooperation in accordance with the provisions of the listed company.

“Zhang Lizhen is just an employee of our company. When she did not actively report to the company, we focused on the issue of directors, supervisors and senior managers of listed companies. Indeed, we did not actively pay attention to this issue (subsidiaries). We will learn relevant experience and lessons and strengthen the compliance training of directors, supervisors and senior managers of subsidiaries.” The staff member said.

As for Zhang Lizhen’s resignation as a director in Shanghai Zhuo Lihe without industrial and commercial change information, the staff member said that it was due to the mistakes of relevant staff.

In response to the problem that the client Chengdu Meixiang has no office and its legal representative said that its main business has low relevance to the business of listed companies, Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) replied that Chengdu Meixiang has entered the field of film and television culture since 2014, focusing on film and television script development, film and television drama production and other related businesses, mainly focusing on urban promotional films and policy promotional films.

Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) said that Chengdu Meixiang has no office because the establishment of the company’s physical network is mainly carried out in the districts, counties and townships of Chongqing, and there are few actual office staff in the office space in Chengdu. However, in a previous interview with the reporter of the daily economic news, its legal representative said that the office space was unoccupied because it was being renovatedp align=”center” style=”text-align:center;”> Image source: screenshot of announcement

The reply to the letter of concern is not consistent with the previous reporter’s survey results. What is right or wrong about the inconsistent explanation of “no one works”? The staff of the aforementioned Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) Securities Department replied to the reporter that the reply in the attention letter was the notification of the business personnel of Chengdu Meixiang. The legal representative of Chengdu Meixiang did not understand the specific business and may have made mistakes.

It is worth mentioning that the staff of Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) Securities Department said that since it is only a business cooperation relationship with Chengdu Meixiang, the main contact from beginning to end is the person in charge of Chengdu Meixiang business, and all work docking is completed with the business personnel, rather than the legal representative of the company.

when did key customers move

Regarding the third major mystery reported by the daily economic news – the hard to find trace of the big customer lemon unlimited, Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) replied that the industrial and commercial registration address and the address disclosed in the annual report of lemon unlimited are the company’s past registration information, not the company’s actual office space, and announced the current actual office address of lemon unlimited Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) said that up to now, lemon unlimited’s business is normal.

On April 17, the Shenzhen stock exchange sent a letter asking the company to specify the time and office address corresponding to the communication, contract signing and business development between yiyoule and lemon unlimited. The annual audit accounting firm visited the personnel, time and specific location of lemon unlimited during the audit process, and explained when lemon unlimited moved to its current office addressp align=”center” style=”text-align:center;”> Source: screenshot of announcement

Previously, on January 27, Shenzhen Stock Exchange issued a letter of concern on the sudden increase of revenue in the fourth quarter of 2021 in Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) “2021 annual performance forecast”, and then sent letters of concern on March 15 and April 8 respectively. On April 17, the Shenzhen Stock Exchange issued a letter of concern to Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) for the fourth timep align=”center” style=”text-align:center;”> Source: screenshot of announcement

The Shenzhen Stock Exchange pointed out that the reply letter of Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) 4 / 15 did not fully reply to the questions raised in the two letters of March 15 and April 8, and the annual audit accounting firm did not fully reply to the special verification opinions involved in the two letters and asked it to further explain the relevant situation.

Specifically, it describes the specific service contents of media content production, data analysis, media platform promotion, launch advantage analysis, cost estimation, scheme formulation, industry data support and operation optimization provided by yiyoule, as well as the data source, information system and personnel guarantee corresponding to the provision of these services.

Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) give examples to illustrate how to formulate different delivery strategies according to customers’ needs and how to convert customers’ demand orders into delivery orders; Explain that Kelin Environmental Protection Equipment Inc(002499) takes Nanji E-Commerce Co.Ltd(002127) , Leo Group Co.Ltd(002131) , Kaisa Jiayun Technology Inc(300242) as the object of comparative analysis, the similarities and differences and the reasons and rationality of the consistency with the revenue recognition methods of the above three companies.

- Advertisment -