On February 8, Shanghai Huaming Intelligent Terminal Equipment Co.Ltd(300462) (hereinafter referred to as ” Shanghai Huaming Intelligent Terminal Equipment Co.Ltd(300462) “) issued a suggestive announcement on the loss of contact of independent directors, saying that it was unable to contact the independent director of the company, Gao Shan, and he was in a state of loss of contact. According to the latest news, Gaoshan has been confirmed dead.
Yesterday, a news spread in the fund circle: Gao Shan, the actual controller of a private placement institution in Shanghai, disappeared during the night run along the riverside on January 10, 2022. The police recently fished out a body from the Huangpu River and informed the family members to recognize the body on February 8. Colleagues from private equity institutions controlled by Takayama also revealed to the media that Takayama disappeared in early January; The company then called the police and reduced its positions around mid January to deal with the pressure of customer redemption.
It is said that at present, the police have been involved in the investigation and contacted the family members of Gaoshan for DNA comparison. Securities Daily reporters inquired that the last public update of the official account of “the Wanshan mountain deep spring” was January 1, 2022, after which it updated its marketing strategy almost every week.
Public information shows that in addition to serving as an independent director in Shanghai Huaming Intelligent Terminal Equipment Co.Ltd(300462) , Gaoshan is also the actual controller and investment director of Shanghai Huanyi fund. Gao Shan, who has 10 years of securities experience, worked in Shanghai Investment Morgan fund and Cathay Pacific Fund. In 2012, he broke away from public funds and “went private”. He successively served as investment manager and research director in Shanghai Kaishi Investment Management Co., Ltd. and Hengsheng Hongding asset management (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. In August 2013, Gaoshan founded Shanghai beilinshan Investment Management Co., Ltd.
According to the information of tianyancha, the reporter of Securities Daily found that Gaoshan worked in six enterprises, of which five were in existence, including Shanghai Huaming Intelligent Terminal Equipment Co.Ltd(300462) , Zhejiang Changyu new materials Co., Ltd. and Yingchuang (Xiamen) Investment Management Co., Ltd. Gaoshan was the shareholder of three of them and served as the director of the other two companies.
In October 2020, Gao Bin served as a Shanghai Huaming Intelligent Terminal Equipment Co.Ltd(300462) director. In December 2020, Gao Bin joined Shanghai Huanyi Private Equity Fund Management Co., Ltd. Tianyancha information shows that Gao Bin is the actual controller of Shanghai Huanyi fund, with a shareholding ratio of 55%. According to the data of private placement network, as of February 8, the overall scale of Shanghai Huanyi private placement fund was about 2 billion yuan to 5 billion yuan, with 48 products under management.
In the last article released by the official account, “A share strategy ahead” in 2022, Gao Bin said that the overall view of 2022 was divided into two levels: the first level is that there is no industry beta, only Alfa. In 2021, successful fund managers still grasped the core track (photovoltaic, new energy vehicles, wind power, military industry). The second level is to consider whether the Internet, consumption and medical industries lost in 2021 will have an opportunity to turn around in 2022, which depends on the changes of macro policies and the judgment and implementation of high-level economic leaders in 2022.
Regarding the loss of contact with Gaoshan, Shanghai Huaming Intelligent Terminal Equipment Co.Ltd(300462) said that up to now, the company has not learned the specific reasons for the loss of contact with Gaoshan. Mr. takasugi does not hold shares in the company. As of the disclosure date of this announcement, 6 directors of the board of directors of the company still perform their duties normally, including 2 independent directors, which is not lower than the minimum quorum, which will not have a significant impact on the daily business activities of the company and the normal development of the work of the board of directors.
